Between political noise, competing versions of reality, and social media feeds that seem determined to keep us arguing, being an informed citizen takes more than keeping up with the headlines.
With the U.S. midterm elections approaching, let’s explore how to stay curious, evaluate the evidence, and make choices that reflect our values rather than simply reacting to the loudest voice in the room.
📊 Getting Better Poll
Share this post and invite others to share what informed their answer or shaped their perspective.
▶️ If you would like a wider lens on how fear and sensational stories shape public trust, check out our award-winning documentary “Trust Me”.
🗳️ Being Informed Is Not the Same as Being Involved
Pew Research Center’s report, How Americans Are Engaged With News, Politics, Religion and Civic Life, offers a useful correction to the idea that people are either politically engaged or completely checked out. Based on surveys of 5,393 US adults conducted in 2025, researchers identified four broad groups. Mobilizers, representing 9% of adults, participate actively across politics, news, and community life. Connectors, at 28%, are involved in their communities but less politically active. Spectators, also 31%, follow the news closely but participate less directly. Another 31% are Outsiders, who engage less across the activities measured.
The interesting distinction is between consuming information and acting on it. Among Spectators, 84% follow national news at least somewhat closely, yet only 49% reported voting in the 2024 election. These findings don’t establish why individuals vote or abstain, and the groups describe patterns rather than fixed identities. Still, they suggest that following every political development does not automatically translate into civic participation. With the 2026 midterms approaching, the opportunity is to connect what we learn about public issues with meaningful action, whether that means voting, attending a local meeting, or contacting an elected representative.
The Better Take:
Being informed gives you context, but participation gives you a way to use it. You don’t need to follow every breaking story or join every political argument to be a responsible citizen. Choose the issues that matter, understand the evidence, and identify one meaningful action you can take. Consistent participation can matter more than constant scrolling.
🤝 Disagreement Is Not the Enemy of Democracy
In a recent episode of A Braver Way, host Mónica Guzmán speaks with civic scholar Yuval Levin about a question that becomes especially relevant during election season. What do we owe one another when we strongly disagree? The conversation challenges the assumption that political division itself is the central threat. Levin argues that passivity, or treating ourselves as spectators rather than citizens, deserves more attention. The discussion makes a distinction worth keeping: disagreement is part of democratic life, while disengagement can leave important decisions to others.
That doesn’t mean every disagreement is constructive or that all political claims deserve equal weight. Evidence still matters, and some arguments are better supported than others. But treating everyone who disagrees with us as an enemy can make it harder to understand their concerns, examine our own assumptions, or find workable solutions. Voting according to our values means more than choosing the candidate who sounds most like us. It also means asking what those values require in practice, examining candidates’ records and proposals, and accepting that people can share a commitment to their communities while reaching different political conclusions.
The Better Take:
Disagreement can sharpen your thinking when you approach it with curiosity instead of defensiveness. Try asking what evidence supports a position, which values underpin it, and what a reasonable person might see differently. You don’t have to abandon your principles to understand another perspective. Better conversations can lead to better-informed decisions.
🔎 The Loudest Political Story Is Not Always the Biggest One
Earlier this year, the University at Buffalo published an interview with Yini Zhang, a communication scholar who studies social media and political communication. Her warning ahead of the midterms was straightforward: online political information can distort our understanding of both events and public opinion. Influencers may reinforce preferred narratives without prioritizing accuracy, while AI-generated content can create convincing but false evidence. Zhang also points to a less obvious problem: highly vocal users can make extreme views appear more widespread than they are. A topic dominating one platform does not necessarily mean it reflects the views of the wider public.
These concerns don’t mean that social media is useless or that every viral claim is false. They mean that visibility and credibility are different things. Zhang recommends that journalists verify online narratives against real-world evidence, explain what is known and uncertain, and avoid presenting social media activity as a reliable measure of public opinion. Those habits are useful for voters, too. Before sharing a dramatic political clip or using a viral post to judge a candidate, trace it to its original source, check the date, and look for independent reporting.
The Better Take:
A few simple verification habits can save you from being misled and help prevent misinformation from spreading through your own networks. Check the original source, compare credible coverage, and distinguish a documented event from someone’s interpretation of it. You don’t need to investigate everything exhaustively. Focus your attention where the consequences are greatest.
📚 Getting Better Recommendations
Ad Fontes Media Bias Chart® - With the U.S. midterm elections approaching, this chart highlights websites that can help voters access reliable, fact-based election information. It features Ballotpedia, which offers election analysis and local voting information, VoteHub, which provides polling data and forecasts, and USAFacts, which explores key issues such as campaign financing, gerrymandering and the two-party system. The resource also highlights how other election-related websites differ in political bias and factual reliability.